Obsessive stalkers represent a category of individuals who are both underestimated and potentially very dangerous. Their behavior often exists in a gray zone between socially tolerated relational discomfort and overt violent crime. This ambiguity contributes to the early trivialization of warning signs, even though stalking trajectories frequently follow a clear pattern of escalation.

One question arises for any investigation professional: can we still trust eyewitnesses, and under what conditions? This article first proposes to examine why the credibility of eyewitnesses often leaves much to be desired in light of the main scientific studies on memory and identification. It will then address concrete cases where a witness’s word contributed to sending an innocent to prison, before outlining the reflexes and best practices that a seasoned investigator shou

Hiring a private detective is a serious, pragmatic step, and in some cases, the only option available for getting clear answers to complex personal situations. It is a concrete and legal solution for turning doubts into certainties and making important decisions based on documented facts.

Written statement analysis is nowadays a valuable discipline within modern investigative agencies. It consists of the methodical examination of a person's remarks - testimonies, correspondence, or various declarations - with the goal of exposing the truthfulness of the account, omissions, inconsistencies, and sometimes implicit admissions or, conversely, false confessions.

In the legal system, a confession is often seen as the ultimate proof of guilt. Yet, research shows that sometimes innocent people confess to crimes they did not commit, under the influence of fatigue, stress, or coercive interrogation techniques.